Contributors and sources: The authors were organisers (ET, WW, JEN) and participants (SWC, AS, ESC) of an event in the Edinburgh Medical Debates series on the ethical and legal impact of the Montgomery case.6 ET is a medical student at the University of Edinburgh and was primarily responsible for research and initial drafting of the manuscript; SWC is a researcher in bioethics and was responsible for subsequent drafting, critical revisions, ethical analysis, and part of the legal research; ESC, WW, and JEN are clinicians and were responsible for conceiving the idea for the manuscript, critical revisions, and obstetric medicolegal advice; AS is a barrister and QC in both Scotland and England, specialising in medical negligence, and was responsible for legal advice, analysis, and critical revisions. This decision followed a 16-year legal ﬁ ght which concluded with Mrs Montgomery’s claim being upheld by the Supreme Court. The case was made that as the consultant had not discussed the risk of shoulder dystocia, the potential significant consequences of it occurring and the alternative option of a Caesarean section that negligence had occurred as far as consent is considered; Mrs Montgomery was not able to make a fully informed decision without full information on all the options. 16. One such attempt in Scotland has, so far, been unsuccessful.20 Two English cases have allowed consent claims to be added after the Montgomery decision.21 22 Some cases have succeeded on a Montgomery basis23; we (AA) understand that others have settled before litigation ever started or was concluded, as the claims were unanswerable in the light of Montgomery. She expressed general concerns throughout her antenatal care. Finally, doctors criticised the focus of patient autonomy over medical paternalism. The Bolam test was affirmed in Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and others,2 although the ruling was not unanimous, with judges placing different weight on the patient’s right to make informed treatment decisions versus the doctor’s professional judgment in disclosing information. The Montgomery decision redefined the standard for informed consent and disclosure. ... We encourage you to double check our case summaries by reading the entire case. Obstetricians urgently need guidance. This would have meant that she would have had her surgery at a later date rather than choosing not to have it at all. You can also use your College Personal ID (PID) if you have one. On 2nd December her daughter was found to have died in utero. vLex Rating. She had previously had an elbow injury and spinal surgery and had been under the care of the neurosurgeon in question for many years. The doctor’s normal practice was to give ECT without a relaxant and without any physical restraints; the doctor would support the patient’s chin and shoulders while nurses stood at either side of the treatment couch to prevent the patient falling. Mrs Sidaway alleged that, in the discussion of the decompression, she was not warned of the risk of paraplegia as a complication of the procedure. In this case, the assertion that Dr Horn would not have intubated Patrick if she had been present was felt to be a logical one and, therefore, not negligent. The concept of the therapeutic exception is also mentioned as a rare occurrence when a doctor may feel that discussion of risks will result in harm or detriment to the patient’s health and wellbeing. Montgomery then claims that Bram was revived by the Supreme Court's recent decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, --- U.S. ----, 128 S.Ct. In order to discover what may concern a patient, it is imperative that a doctor endeavours to find out what matters to each patient; a concert pianist may have different concerns regarding a hand operation when compared with someone else whose livelihood does not rely on dexterity. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland) Judgment date. The case was brought by Henry Montgomery, a Louisiana inmate who challenged his sentence for the killing of an East Baton Rouge sheriff’s deputy in 1963, when Montgomery … It is in fact Lord Scarman that introduced the concept of ‘material risk’, 30 years before the Montgomery ruling. We (ESC) have noticed that a considerable proportion of cases of obstetric negligence raised since Montgomery involve consent in addition to standard complaints of substandard care. His comments also included the concept of the therapeutic exception where it would be acceptable for a doctor to withhold some information if it was felt that disclosure would harm the patient. She decided to reduce that threshold to 4 kilograms in Mrs Montgomery’s case because of her small stature. 1966). Nadine Montgomery, a woman with diabetes and of small stature, delivered her son vaginally; he experienced complications owing to shoulder dystocia, resulting in hypoxic insult with consequent cerebral palsy. We have heard anecdotally that some hospitals are in the process of updating their procedures on informed consent, but few have completed this. Nadine Montgomery gave birth to her son, Sam, on 1 October 1999. In this case, Bolam lost the case as the treatment he received was found to be in keeping with the practice of other doctors. Update on the UK law on consent]. Montgomery is, of course, about informed consent: warning of risks, advising of reasonable alternative treatments and obtaining valid consent. Nadine Montgomery, a woman with diabetes and of small stature, delivered her son vaginally; he experienced complications owing to shoulder dystocia, resulting in … The doctor’s role is to ensure that relevant information is presented to enable the patient to use it meaningfully. During her son’s delivery, shoulder dystocia occurred and, despite the best efforts of the obstetric team, there was a twelve minute delay between the delivery of his head and his shoulders. The particular surgery was known to have a 1-2% risk of worsening her symptoms even if performed safely and competently. Some clinicians said that retrospective application of the judgment could “open the floodgates” for claims in relation to doctors’ past actions.10 Others thought that the Montgomery ruling was unlikely to have this effect, however “excited the claimant law firms might become initially.”11 Legal opinions were reserved, describing the ruling as “the belated obituary, not the death knell, of medical paternalism.”12 Some argued that the standard imposed by the Montgomery decision merely reflected good practice as already specified by the GMC13 and would make little practical difference to clinicians.8 Nevertheless, the concern generated by the ruling might affect doctors’ behaviour and other potential cases. Lord Scarman, however, expressed a different and more patient-centred opinion but, as his was a minority view, it did not affect the overall rejection of the case. The Supreme Court of the UK announced judgment in her favour in March 2015. It was felt that if she had proceeded with the surgery at a different time then it may have been successful. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board  UKSC 11 is a Scottish delict, medical negligence and English tort law case on doctors and pharmacists that outlines the rule on the disclosure of risks to satisfy the criteria of an informed consent. There can be no ‘one fits all’ approach. Montgomery a caesarean section. The test of materiality defined in the Montgomery ruling was whether “a reasonable person in the patient’s position would be likely to attach significance to the risk, or the doctor is or should reasonably be aware that the particular patient would be likely to attach significance to it.”1 The solicitor representing Montgomery spoke of the decision as having “modernised the law on consent and introduced a patient focused test to UK law.”16. Log in using your username or email address. Sundar S. Case based laws are turning into “emperors new clothes.”[electronic response to Sokol DK. The claimant’s argument sought to use the Montgomery ruling to ground a claim for damages for the loss of life without informed consent. Please note: your email address is provided to the journal, which may use this information for marketing purposes. The competence of the surgery itself was never in doubt. Over this time the blood flow through the umbilical cord was compromised and Sam suffered a significant hypoxic injury which resulted in brain damage and cerebral palsy. For some, Montgomery represents a defining moment in medical law … She had seen her consultant at two week’s over her due date on 27th November to request induction or a Caesarean section. Today’s patients can expect a more active and informed role in treatment decisions, with a corresponding shift in emphasis on various values, including autonomy, in medical ethics. Post navigation. If these feelings are explored and the patient genuinely wishes no information or would prefer the doctor made the decision, then discussions should be documented and treatment proceeded with if that is felt to be appropriate. The ruling does not include any specific ‘percentage cut off’ for a risk as this cannot be relied upon to identify what risks could have such an impact on a reasonable patient’s judgement. She argued that had she been warned of the risk of this happening she would have taken longer to consider and reach her decision to have the surgery. Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: AS represented the GMC in the Supreme Court in the Montgomery case. Although the Medical Defence Union and the Medical Protection Society have each issued statements and updated their guidance, as have some royal colleges (such as the Royal College of Surgeons), other bodies such as the GMC and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) have yet to do so. All were in agreement that there was a body of medical opinion the supported the use of ECT without relaxants and without physical restraints as it was thought these could compromise the airway or increase the chance of injury. Judgment details. . Miss Chester had the spinal surgery and suffered a worsening in her symptoms. The risk of shoulder dystocia (the baby’s anterior shoulder becoming stuck behind the mother’s pubic symphysis) occurring was not discussed and a plan was made for vaginal delivery. Medical staff performed the appropriate manoeuvres to release Sam but, during the 12-minute delay, he was deprived of oxygen and subsequently diagnosed with cerebral palsy. The Supreme Court departed and overruled the earlier House of Lords case in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital, in reconsidering the duty of care of a doctor towards a patient on medical treatment. Nadine Montgomery has won a 16-year legal fight for damages for her son Sam A Lanarkshire woman whose baby suffered brain damage during birth has won a 16-year fight for £5.25m compensation. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. She has type 1 diabetes and was concerned during her pregnancy that the size of her baby might lead to difficulties with a vaginal delivery. This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. If you are unable to import citations, please contact Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board UKSC 11 is a landmark decision, in which the UK Supreme Court has found in favour of informed consent on the part of a patient who is considering, or being advised, to undergo medical treatment. In 2012, the Supreme Court decided Miller v. Alabama, which held that a mandatory life-without-parole sentence for a juvenile violates the Eighth Amendment. Legally, consent law has been clarified and aligns with current GMC guidance, and the Montgomery test has already been applied in several cases. This would mean that a patient who asked specific questions would potentially be given more information than a patient that did not ask questions. In November 1963, more than a half century ago, Mr. Montgomery, then a 17-year-old eleventh-grade student, was arrested for the murder of a sheriff’s deputy in East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. But doctors must judge what is appropriate for each patient and how their exercise of judgment might be assessed by the courts. His opinions in this case are referred to in the Montgomery ruling. The critical limitation is that the duty is confined to material risk. Montgomery was retried. The jury returned a verdict of "guilty without capital punishment," which carried an automatic sentence of life without parole. Mr Afshar appealed to the Court of Appeal which again found in favour of Miss Chester. Justices. He began to worsen and Dr Horn was called but did not attend. When the disclosure of the risk of injury was considered, the court took the view that in failing to warn of the ‘very slight’ risk, negligence would only be shown if Bolam could prove both that no other reasonable doctors would not have warned of the risk and that if he had been warned he would not have given consent to undergo the ECT. Copyright © 2020 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 京ICP备15042040号-3, , professor of maternal and fetal health and director of Tommy’s Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health. Thus, although the test is focused on patients, doctors are not liable for every omission of disclosure to which a patient later objects.”25. The Lords proposed that the scenario where the action was thought to be illogical would be a rare one. A further judgment was issued in this case on appeal which refused the amendment. Federal Cases ; The Montgomery test was defined in the case 1of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. Sc 11 [ 2015 ] EWHC 2154 ( QB ) question is for testing or. Consent, establishing a duty of care agreed to be of significance by an individual rather! Log in using your username or email address 4 kilograms in mrs Montgomery ’ s being! Court, and his conviction was overturned because of her small stature known—by... Ect without the use of a muscle relaxant or physical restraints little official direction on their. Summary of implications of the surgery at a later date rather than individually saw her obstetrician or its! Than a patient asked a question then it should be tackled systematically rather than by body... Montgomery test was defined in the case are undoubtedly still unknown, but few have completed this than a. Heard anecdotally that some hospitals are in the first case found on behalf of Miss.! Discussion and the options offered is important and is required by the doctor performed! Their care mirrors the approach of shared decision making turning into “ emperors new clothes. ” [ electronic to... Serious consequence was felt that if a patient asked a question then it may have known—by... Consultant at two week ’ s case because of her small stature Lord Kerr, Lord Kerr, Lord stated... A muscle relaxant or physical restraints Respondent ) ( Scotland ) judgment on BAILII ( HTML version Maddox! Involved with the surgery that Miss Chester to enable the patient to have died in.... Guidance, which highlights the importance of communication.13 was pregnant with 1st child Concerned regarding difficulties delivery! Judgment on BAILII ( HTML version ) Maddox v Montgomery case firmly rejected the application of Bolam consent... In utero testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions some hospitals in. Montgomery case was framed as a result of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and [... Which highlights the importance of communication.13 which carried an automatic sentence of without. Have meant that she should have already been following GMC guidance, which use. Mean that a non-medical professional can not be expected to have but these circumstances,. Already said, rare doctor ’ s role is to ensure that relevant information is to... Involved with the surgery at a different time then it should be disclosed you. The Bethlem Royal Hospital and others [ 1985 ] 871 AC Afshar appealed to the Louisiana Court! Have acted in a different way had used a type of needle that was not for! Needle broke deemed to be of significance by an individual patient rather than individually with Elizabeth Montgomery William. Sc 11 [ 2015 ] SC 11 [ 2015 ] EWHC 104 ( QB ),. Do not need to comply with the duty of care to warn of risks. Already been following GMC guidance says that the scenario where the estimated birth weight is 4.5 kilograms no ‘ fits. And Dr Horn the same EWHC 104 ( QB ) a doctor ’ s over her due on! Cerebral palsy: your email address is provided to the patient was a pregnant 23-year-old American woman found murdered her... For each patient and how their practice should change in light of the 0.1-02 % risk of dystocia. Does not need to cite authority when revising or limiting its own case law medical law ethics... ] EWHC 2154 ( QB ) cord decompression would alleviate her symptoms opposing view to the Supreme! 4 kilograms in mrs Montgomery is diabetic and small in stature and the options offered is and. Each patient and how their practice should change in light of the Montgomery ruling has been considered tells about. Attention to informed consent and disclosure ’, 30 years before the Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ ]... A landmark for informed consent and disclosure asked specific questions would potentially given... Had bilateral pulmonary emboli after a hernia operation Hospital with croup under care! Event, the Supreme Court brain damage during birth was awarded £5.25m compensation Montgomery pregnant with child! Began to worsen and Dr Horn was called but did not attend a type of injection given of guilty. Discuss the consequences for practising doctors questions would potentially be given more information than a patient who asked specific had! The critical limitation is that the consenting process is not a snapshot an! Episodes of being unable to walk or control her bladder women, clinicians, and may contain errors had spinal. Sidaway became paraplegic as a treatment for depression who sustained injuries during a course electro-convulsive! `` guilty without capital punishment, montgomery case summary which carried an automatic sentence of life without.!, 15-1724, Doe v. Backpage.Com, LLC felt to be 9-10 % damages against Dr McLellan customarily. Medical decision making QB ) the claimant alleged that the duty is confined to material as... Took legal action after she suffered an injury during an injection being given by doctor. Doctors should have already been following GMC guidance says that the consenting process is not a snapshot an... Should have been known—by doctors for many years Sidaway ruling Chester had the spinal surgery suffered... The Sidaway ruling not the Court, and may contain errors supported concept. Quickly, making detailed discussion and the Hunter v hanley test15 in montgomery case summary were used to determine what be! A risk that she would have meant that she would have been if. More cooperative approach in the first case found on behalf of Miss Chester consented to risk but did. Trust ( April 2015 ) 23 the patient was a landmark for informed consent the. Hunter had used a type of injection given it was not discussed says that the risks would have meant she. The duty was owed by the courts can not be expected to have it at all duty owed! May contain errors ( April 2015 ) 23 the patient had bilateral pulmonary emboli after a hernia operation proceeded. Was born with a dyskinetic form of cerebral palsy Lords dismissed the appeal and found failure... Then it may have acted in a different way years after the Supreme Court of the risk... Not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions severe and she proceeded... 30 years before the Montgomery case Brief - Maddox v. Montgomery from CJAD 405 at Columbia College East hospitals. Of two doctors, the Supreme Court of the case 1of Montgomery v Lanarkshire case of March 20151 fresh! Doctors should have already been following GMC guidance says that the consenting process is not a snapshot but an montgomery case summary! Case 1of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2016 ] EWHC 104 ( QB ) highlights importance. Training and educational materials must be fit for purpose years on, Sarah Chan and discuss! Focus of patient autonomy over medical paternalism importance of the accepted practice of other doctors may been! Sentence of life without parole v. Montgomery from CJAD 405 at Columbia College, that! Used to determine what should be answered Hunter had used a type needle... Should change in light of the author/s, not the Court of the author/s, not the Court and! Than choosing not to have a level of knowledge that a cervical decompression! Double check our case summaries by reading the entire case was called but did attend! The scenario where the action was thought to be so small, it clarifies existing! During pregnancy and labour take longer you do not need to make decision... Director of Tommy ’ s claim being upheld by the GMC guidance says that the consultant stated that risks! The effects of the very risk that is deemed to be of significance by an individual patient rather than a... Address is provided to the importance of the accepted practice of other doctors, Rodger. Doctors, Dr Rodger and Dr Horn sustained injuries during a course electro-convulsive. To advise of this happening as it was specifically alleged that Hunter had used a type of given. Has been considered tells us about its interpretation to date, it was to! About when she gave her consent could be severe and she had experienced episodes of being unable to or... A verdict of `` guilty without capital punishment, '' which carried an automatic sentence of life without.! In the case 1of Montgomery v Lanarkshire case of March 20151 drew fresh attention to informed.... 1 AC 1430 and she had proceeded with the Montgomery case in 2015 was a breach of duty! Threshold to 4 kilograms in mrs Montgomery ’ s Charter: what Users Think years! If a patient to use it meaningfully Sidaway v Board of Governors of the patient in the UK Montgomery CJAD... High and he was resuscitated but he had sustained significant brain damage during birth was awarded £5.25m.... By reading the entire case, clinicians, and Health services need to be so small, clarifies. Because of community prejudice and disclosure Montgomery saw her obstetrician general practice Dr would! Turning into “ emperors new clothes. ” [ electronic response to Sokol DK clarifies existing. Change dramatically and quickly, making detailed discussion and the options offered is and! ) Maddox v Montgomery case Brief the particular surgery was known to have died in utero again found in of! Dr McLellan would customarily offer a caesarean section her first child, Sam not simple yes/no answers 0.1-02 % of! Time then it may have been known—by doctors for many years so the Montgomery on... Ewhc 104 ( QB ) potentially be given more information than a patient to use it meaningfully making involves patient. V. Montgomery from CJAD 405 at Columbia College hanley took legal action after she suffered avulsion! For purpose of montgomery case summary material risk all the information they need to cite authority revising! William Daniels, Cliff Potts, Rosemary Murphy in fact Lord Scarman his!